ruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square105linkfedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down114
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-linkWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square105linkfedilink
minus-squareDirtPuddleMisfortune@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoWhy do you keep appimages? I don’t do that and now I’m wondering if I do something wrong. But I try to install from repos as much as possible.
minus-squaremed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoI’ve used one or two tools that only distribute for my system as an appimage or as source code. I can’t always be bothered to set up a compilation environment or deal with removing dependencies. I only use one or two regularly, but it’s nice to have them integrated! I prefer from the distro’s repos, then source, then flatpack, then appimage. Sometimes you have to take what you can get!
minus-squareQuibblekrust@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 hours agoThe appImage is the program. If you don’t keep it, you don’t have the program.
Why do you keep appimages? I don’t do that and now I’m wondering if I do something wrong. But I try to install from repos as much as possible.
I’ve used one or two tools that only distribute for my system as an appimage or as source code.
I can’t always be bothered to set up a compilation environment or deal with removing dependencies.
I only use one or two regularly, but it’s nice to have them integrated!
I prefer from the distro’s repos, then source, then flatpack, then appimage. Sometimes you have to take what you can get!
The appImage is the program. If you don’t keep it, you don’t have the program.