RmDebArc_5@feddit.org to Animemes@ani.socialEnglish · 2 days agoah yesani.socialimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1505arrow-down11
arrow-up1504arrow-down1imageah yesani.socialRmDebArc_5@feddit.org to Animemes@ani.socialEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square106linkfedilink
minus-squarenightlily@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·edit-214 hours agoSo you want others who want others dead for the crime of existing, dead for the crime of existing? Edit: clearly I should have used /s for the obvious joking wordplay on a meme community
minus-squareFreeAZ@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 hours agoNo dumbass, you literally just listed their crime, its not “existing”. If they were just existing they wouldn’t be targeted, they wouldn’t be guilty of genocide.
minus-squarePollo_Jack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoIt isn’t a difficult concept. x wants nightlily dead for being German. y wants x dead for wanting Germans to be dead. It isn’t recursive.
minus-squareGrey Cat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·24 hours agoExactly. You get it ! You have to be intolerant of the intolerant.
So you want others who want others dead for the crime of existing, dead for the crime of existing?
Edit: clearly I should have used /s for the obvious joking wordplay on a meme community
No dumbass, you literally just listed their crime, its not “existing”. If they were just existing they wouldn’t be targeted, they wouldn’t be guilty of genocide.
It isn’t a difficult concept. x wants nightlily dead for being German. y wants x dead for wanting Germans to be dead.
It isn’t recursive.
Exactly. You get it ! You have to be intolerant of the intolerant.