Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

Example of a KDE dev not wanting environmental concerns to play any role, despite KDE having an environmental project:

Devs rejecting any notion of transparency by disclosing AI usage in code submissions (in direct opposition to advice from the FSFE):

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

  • Toga77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    World sees AI doing awful things like nudifying children, making nearly every software we use worse, and stealing the world’s knowledge to sell back to us, and generally dislikes AI.

    Moronic software devs with massive egos: "WE SHOULD USE AI SEE HOW EASY THIS MAKES MY LIFE NOW I DONT HAVE TO LEARN. "

    Also them: “I swear I just use it to augment my work! I’d never take a shortcut and eventually keep taking shortcuts and outsource my thinking! Humans notoriously NEVER take shortcuts!”

    Guys wtf are we even doing anymore.

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And it wrecks the environment, and it stunts the user’s intelligence without actually being able to do anything truly original or novel, and it makes worse, buggier, less secure, less maintainable software. The list goes on and on

    • ElectricVocalist@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      AI is not a thing, it doesn’t act, it doesn’t think. Humans do. Humans nudify children, humans enshitify software, humans steal content

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        it doesn’t act,

        I don’t disagree with anything else you are saying or the sentiment, but with the rise of “AI Agents” it is becoming more common that the AI actually does something. It seems like there is a new story every few days about an agent deleting an entire database or buying plane tickets or sending an e-mail to the FBI. Unfortunately, we have people giving it more and more permissions and ability to “just act” and it is only getting worse.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Most of those ‘news’ stories are sensationalized to the point of fiction.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You sound like “Guns don’t kill people! Robbers do!”

        So I’m going to ask you, would you give a gun to a child? Would you? Just answer that

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Exactly.

        All of the Anti-AI people are actually anti-capitalists, they’re just not finished diagnosing the problem.

        AI isn’t building data centers, capitalists are. They’re doing it in such a destructive and rapid manner because they’re trying to leverage their infinite amount of cash into a future monopoly. If it wasn’t AI it would have been some other product.

        Fighting the product and ignoring the actual human beings who are making these destructive decisions is only adding to the smoke screen that shifts blame away from names like Huang, Altman, and Musk.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think you can be anticapitalist and also anti-AI. I’m certainly both

            Yes, the venn is basically a circle.

            All of the ‘bad things AI is doing’ are bad things that capitalists are doing.

            Nobody is actually angry at AI for solving age old mathematical problems, folding proteins or locating cancers. It’s not the technology that people care about.

            People are angry at rapacious capitalism and are misdirecting it at the technology and not the rapacious capitalists. Anti-AI is just Anti-Capitalism for new leftists.

          • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Same here! I don’t care who is responsible for it, no matter where on the political spectrum the creators are, I’m still not supporting it.