I’m curious to know why people use systemd-less distributions. Which one would you recommend to someone who wants to stop using systemd?

  • nyan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Gentoo is not exactly a systemd-less distribution—you do have the option of installing it instead of going with the default (OpenRC). Personally, though, my Linux use predates systemd and no one has ever presented what I would consider a compelling reason for me to switch to it, so I install all my systems with OpenRC. I’ve reached a stage in my life where I dislike unnecessary churn in utility software.

    From a less-personal standpoint, I consider the philosophy behind systemd to be wrongheaded (as in, it looks very much like Microsoft’s embrace-extend-extinguish—and no, I do not trust Red Hat not to be sold to someone who will take advantage). Many of the other reasons-not-to-use given by others here also ring true to me.

    • Arcka@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do not trust Red Hat not to be sold to someone who will take advantage

      They’ve been IBM since 2019.

      • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hardly any of the core systemd people work at Redhat these days. Microsoft employs more of them then Redhat. Right now I think Lennarts new company employes several of the key systemd people.

        Contributions are comming in from all major distributions though.

      • nyan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        And IBM could very easily sell them on, or the leadership there could change and decide to do something unpleasant (although I know IBM has a long history of being about as maneuverable as a parade float, it still could happen).