• davetortoise@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You are incorrect. Marx felt strongly that his ideas should be used politically to change the state of the world. Aspects of Marxism can be applied in a scientific/apolitical way, but this is not what it was initially developed for.

    • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Marx still wouldn’t agree with turning his work into an ideology to be followed. Besides, scientific doesn’t mean apolitical.

        • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The part where Marxism was basically treated as a religion in the USSR. You weren’t required to read or understand anything, as long as you follow The Party.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Every society has ideology, you just don’t notice the dominant one for the same reason a fish doesn’t notice water. Ideology is just a framework for understanding the world, everyone has some such framework and if you think you don’t it’s only because you haven’t examined it or considered other perspectives.

            Western countries have had anti-communist purges, and as for treating ideology as religion, well…

            As for this idea that “you don’t have to read or understand anything” that’s patently untrue. Literacy is consistently one of the top priorities of communists, and if you look at actual data as opposed to just saying whatever thought happens to enter your head, it backs that up.

            Or as one anti-communist put it: