• bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it works completely fine with Wine - in many cases, better than under Windows - why do you care if there’s a translation layer? Seems like a weird hill to die on. Do you also feel like running 32-bit applications on a 64-bit architecture means you chose the wrong architecture?

    • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you use a Windows “translation layer” for your software anyway, why would you choose Linux as the host platform in the first place?

      • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There are so many reasons. Here’s just a few off the top of my head:

        • Windows isn’t free, Linux is.
        • Windows isn’t an open platform, Linux is.
        • Linux doesn’t track your activity. Windows does.
        • Linux doesn’t come bundled with a bunch of shovelware crap. Windows does.
        • Linux doesn’t push cloud products onto you. Windows does.
        • Linux doesn’t use your hardware to force-feed ads to you. Windows does.
        • Linux is infinitely more customizable than Windows.
        • Linux lets you choose when, how, and if you download/install updates. Windows does not.
        • Windows constantly pushes/forces AI slop products onto users. Linux does not.
        • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          All of that is true for most other operating systems, some of which are even more customizable than some of today’s Linux distributions. My question was “why Linux?”, not “why not Windows?”.

          • ayush@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Question is a not relevant to the discussion, and might be an (possibly unintentional?) attempt at derailing the conversation. @bearboiblake@pawb.social answered the question more than adequately. Their point still holds: If needed, there are many ways to run Windows apps under other operating systems (including Linux). Choosing an OS between Linux - and it’s various flavors, FreeBSD etc is outside the scope of the original discussion.

          • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh – in that case, because Linux is vastly more popular than any other alternative free operating system or system distribution, has infinitely more support options and software available than alternatives, and a much larger community/install base, meaning that if you have a problem or want some tool, it’s far more likely to be available for Linux than any other free alternative.

            • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              vastly more popular

              Windows is more popular than Linux, so is macOS. Now is that a reason or not?

              has infinitely more support options and software available than alternatives

              False.

              if you … want some tool, it’s far more likely to be available for Linux than any other free alternative.

              Which tool does (e.g.) FreeBSD lack for you?

              • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                Windows is more popular than Linux, so is macOS. Now is that a reason or not?

                notice the word free

                False.

                ok lol

                Which tool does (e.g.) FreeBSD lack for you?

                Well, Docker is the archetypal example, though I’m sure there are plenty of others. I’ve never particularly cared to get into BSD, because I have no incentive to do so.

                • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  ok lol

                  Please don’t troll. Last warning before mute.

                  I’ve never particularly cared to get into BSD, because I have no incentive to do so.

                  You should. It can’t hurt to know alternatives, you know.

                  • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Please don’t troll.

                    You just said “False”. How tf am I meant to engage with that in any kind of productive way? It’s like saying “no u”.

                    Last warning before mute.

                    Why would I care if you block me? It would be your loss, really – I’m a very cool, nice, fun, friendly guy, you’d be missing out on some potentially great comments.

                    You should.

                    Why? Genuinely asking, I’ve never looked into it because I have no real incentive to try it. I’ve used NetBSD on a server before, and it was fine, but like, what reason would I have to move away from Linux? It works completely perfectly for all of my use cases.