• sbeak@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I believe Flatpak is safer than the AUR, as there is comparatively more vetting by third parties (e.g. Flathub). Also, the apps you install are sandboxd, which has upsides in terms of security but may have downsides for certain kinds of app, since permissions for full file access, communication with other apps, etc. are restricted by default.

    I like the AUR since it’s more “native” than the one-size-fits-all Flatpak, but I use both depending on the use case for that app. Sometimes, one version is out of date, in which case I would prefer Tue other.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is what I had assumed as well, so thanks for confirming!

      Not sure how what you mean by “native” though. Flatpak apps don’t run in some kind of virtualization, do they? Or you mean native to the package system?

      • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Native as in how Flatpaks are a universal package format while AUR is Arch-specific. There are some occasional quirks in some Flatpak apps. For instance, Flatpak Localsend does not detect the system accent colour, while the AUR version does. It’s not a problem for most apps though.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah Flatpak applications need access to some portal or something I guess in order to gain access to stuff.

          Meh, I like it. I use it for stuff I don’t necessarily trust, like Slack, Discord (which hasn’t been launched for a while now…), Steam (higher trust in that than the others though), etc. Non-free stuff. 🙂