🦄🦄🦄

Maybe it was “”“too easy”“” for us to get to space so that chemical propulsion was good enough. Who knows where we would be if that wasn’t the case.

What is this from?

Have you ever heard about “”“vaccine hesistancy”“” or somesuch from anti-democratic countries like China or Russia? I haven’t. The Anti-Vax movement was started to damage democratic countries. Only one of many psyops against the west.

“I can’t answer this, so it must be a trick.”

Ok then.

So if someone declares you food, is it now moral for them to slit your throat and butcher you?

Nah, it’s morally wrong and if you are honest you will actually agree. Let me explain:

Let’s set a moral baseline that we both agree with. Shooting a random person that has done no harm to anyone in the head without their explicit consent is morally bad, yes?

Now, what is different about, say, a pig that makes it less than morally bad to kill the pig? If we then apply that difference to that random human again, is it now less than morally bad to kill them?

The honest answer (and one that I can at least accept) is: there is no such difference.

What is your answer?

I was directly adressing the points brought up by the other person. What did you contribute?

Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong, weather it happens in a factory farm or on that mythical uncles farm that tottaly loves and pets his animals to death.

And yes, it’s ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain. They can’t feel pain because they lack a nervous system to do so as well as an evolutionary reason for pain to exist.

And even if plants feel pain, it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.