• 1 Post
  • 144 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 23rd, 2025

help-circle





  • Notice how they’ve provided access to 200 million protein predictions in the human proteome and various plants?

    Does that sound like it has completed prediction for proteomes of all life on earth?

    Does it ever say it is complete even if only for humans?

    Does it ever say the workers on the project had verified the validity of even a fraction of the predictions or discovered application of the findings?

    It wasn’t “finished”, it was shut down and the employees reassigned to work on a project that produvesw nothing but worthless slop images and texts, buggy code, and occasionally deletes a database.






  • I still think that’s not good enough, that treating them fairly is a stupid waste of time and resources and unfair to everyone else.

    Just make the rule “any slop” and give the idiots a checkbox so they can ban themselves for reasons which will never be revealed to them (sloppers don’t read documents, it’ll take them a while to figure out). Also start banning people when evidence surfaces of them admitting to slopping.

    I don’t like this concept that a slopper can potentially produce decent code, the data shows this simply isn’t true: sloppers produce vast amounts more and worse bugs and vulnerabilities. It’s better for the health of the project to ban it in every scenario.