Yes that’s us

Fair enough. I’m not going to follow up with all that just for this comment thread. At least we can agree that some things are bad enough to justify not using.

My argument is that the environmental costs of AI, not to mention the knock-on effects of the societal change it incurs, lead to people dying.

What about a tool that killed someone every time you used it? Or every ten times you used it? There’s a line somewhere, right?

Some things deserve zero tolerance IMO

The graffiti on the AI lab isn’t clearly about AI?

Strawman. No ones advocating for destroying existing web infrastructure. It’s clear what this is about.