eurodyne
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
eurodyne@piefed.worldto
Linux@programming.dev•Initial Apple M3 Pro / Max / Ultra Support Being Upstreamed For Linux 7.3English
4·3 days agoThe bootloader has already seen fixes because of issues asahi uncovered.
Oh, I didn’t know that.
You know what they say: a rising tide lifts all boats
eurodyne@piefed.worldto
Linux@programming.dev•Initial Apple M3 Pro / Max / Ultra Support Being Upstreamed For Linux 7.3English
91·3 days agoAlso, Apple was questioned about this when the project started, and they basically said that they wish the project the best of luck and that Apple isn’t going to do anything to stand in their way.
As absurdly proprietary as Apple‘s hardware is, they’ve never explicitly done anything to block others from running different software on it. Yes, it is difficult to do so under certain circumstances, for all sorts of weird proprietary, Apple reasons, but to explicitly go out of their way to block it? Certainly never on their computers.
Although they do completely lock out their EFI and boot controllers, but they say that strictly a matter of preserving system security or whatever, and that’s believable. Inconvenient, but because that is also extremely proprietary, I believe them.
After all, I have fedora running on a 14 year-old iMac, and it was surprisingly easy to install. The only issues I had related to a dead internal display, but I would imagine I would also have similar problems with any other all-in-one computer with a dead internal display.
eurodyne@piefed.worldto
Linux@programming.dev•Initial Apple M3 Pro / Max / Ultra Support Being Upstreamed For Linux 7.3English
8·3 days agoWait, what?!
eurodyne@piefed.worldto
Linux@programming.dev•Finally done with the distro-hop: My return to FedoraEnglish
10·10 days agoRecently switched to Fedora myself, and I could not be happier ❤️

Mmmmyeeaahhh, maybe, but I am a couple decades past trying to read the tea leaves with that guy. If that’s what he really meant, he could’ve come out and just said that – but he didn’t. He was intentionally ambiguous, mostly because I think he’s just tired of dealing with the issue (and an increasingly cunty crowd), and wanted to push the responsibility of making a decision off of himself and back onto the users. I will admit that he is far more composed than I would be in his position.
On one hand, I don’t blame him, but on another hand, I really wish he would’ve taken a stance (prefer preferably anti-AI).
He gave a professional response to a gigantic community because he has a professional responsibility to do so. Personally, I think he gave the only response he could. What does he personally think? Like I said, I’m a couple of decades past trying to read the tea leaves on that guy. But you could be right.