There are no correct axioms. You can change the axioms as you wish and make your own math2.0. And you will be able to apply it to things that follow thoose axioms but finding such things that follow them is the only hard part. We define 1+1=2 and that is true because we define it that way. If it does not hold true in any physical or something then it is that you are applying a correct math for a system which doesnt work with that math(i.e, you are the problem for assuming the same axiom is true for the real system)

Bro lmao

Thanks

What is that reaction? I honestly don’t know

I mean topologically no, since sock is equivalent to some flat surface.

And to your original question, when you put a hole in the sock, it does become a tube. And a tubr can be seen as a surface with one hole

second hole

You mean the first hole

Well but this meme is accurate because it said monitoring the situation. So when you start monitoring which slit the particle goes through, you changed the outcome.

Lots of triangles

NOT for mathematicians

Mathematicians: makes something with zero practical applications

Waffles: