

recency bias
lol, by that argument you’re a bedwetter who suckles on your mother’s breast and doesn’t know how to read or write


recency bias
lol, by that argument you’re a bedwetter who suckles on your mother’s breast and doesn’t know how to read or write


dude spend two min googling ‘Chinese atrocities from 1900’
Ok, I did that exact thing verbatim, and the entire first page of results are things that happened before anyone here was born.
I’m not about to claim they’re saintly in any way, for sure they have lots of well-documented internal issues with civil liberties, free speech, and oppression of minority groups, but the fact that you’re going so far into the past to make your case just makes it a case in support of the opposite view.


not to get all tankie on you, but China has thus far managed to restrain themselves from bombing other countries’ civilian populations.


You know how sometimes a story seems so completely crazy, that you wonder what detail has been left out? Like… the payment provider just randomly wanted a list of all passwords? What?
“The atomic bombings were necessary” was something we were expected to internalize as an indisputable hard fact, like gravity and oxbow lakes.
Yeah, I think this is a lot more plausible than the wall heating theory that someone further up got way more upvotes for.