- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
- linux@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
- linux@programming.dev
This is weirdly timely, considering I installed Feishin last week in my never-ending quest to find a music player that’s as familiar and useful to me as iTunes.
Initially I was put off at having to also install Navidrome just to be able to listen to the music I alredy have available to me, but ultimately it’s ok. And yeah, Feishin is nice. Perhaps a little ‘busy’, but compared to Strawberry it’s minimal, stripped down application. I know everyone seems to love Strawberry, but I hate it. I shouldn’t have to make a playlist in order to be able to listen to an album. Just let me press play on the sodding album!
Anyway, yeah +1 for Feishin here.
I only listen to albums (I have zero playlists) and I just double click on an album in Strawberry to listen to it.
For iTunes based music player there is also rhythmbox which is standalone (no subsonic server needed). It’s what i used until i ultimately switched to navidrome + supersonic. I’ll check out feishin since that didn’t come up in my initial search last year. Ive liked supersonic though. It has a decent, simple UI and you can play albums by clicking on them
Edit: ok feishin seems pretty cool. I might stick with this
I stopped using iTunes around 2012 and I expect its design has changed quite a bit, since then; Banshee was a perfect capture of it, then, and I haven’t been able to find a suitable replacement for Banshee since development halted on it.
Granted, the most important qualities, for me, is for the player to allow tagging within the app. and to rename and organize the files by their tags automatically once those tags have been modified and every Linux developer seems to hate that so my unique requirements seem to largely drive my impediment.
Using Electron for something that should be lightweight like a music player should be an automatic disqualification.
No mention of VLC?
Ive been using vlc so long I forgot there was anything else…
For music library management and playback? Why would they mention it? Just because it can play audio formats doesn’t mean it’s suitable for every use case or they’d have to mention every FFmpeg frontend too.
“The state of Linux music players” but no mention of Audacious or Deadbeef? For shame.
Yeah, I did not expect them to do that title justice, because how in the hell could anyone try 200 music players, but how did they get down to 7 and somehow skip some of the most popular players…? Did all of those somehow look broken on their setup? 🫠
For my mpd + ncmpcpp folks I would highly recommend RMPC. It’s more of a modern take on TUI players (and actually supports displaying album covers!)
I feel stuck between players that feel old and aged like Strawberry, and yet more electron apps like feishin. I’ve been using Supersonic, but I’d like to see more variety
Feishin, SuperSonic, cmus, and kew are the only ones I really like with kew being my personal favourite.
I don’t need much from my music player as I just like to hit shuffle on all my songs (6000+) and kew just does that.
I’ve also started thinking about doing streaming music again as I currently have a month trial with Qobuz and I really like it. Thankfully lastnight I was FINALLY able to find a linux Qobuz player, QBZ, that works very well as I’m not a fan of the Qobuz webplayer.
wait spin a docker container with navidrome and another docker with aonsoku web player and call it done or use any subsonic compatible clients. And this work anywhere!
Doesn’t even mention deadbeef lmao

Quod Libet’s my player of choice
Cue sheets are important.
What are cue sheets?
.cue files are there to inform your player about where songs/chapters start in a record. It’s mostly for situation where you have ripped CDs as singular files and not tracks. It’s a frequent occurence in lossless torrents (.flac, .alac, .wav, audiocd territory) and the reasoning behind that may be that it keeps the most exact copy of a CD without any user-side interference, and .cue files are text files laying alongside your cd rip (and probably a log of ripping). Such interference may also be seen as unwanted in some cases, e.g. when the record is mastered that way one track seemlessly flows into another, so any way to cut between them is arguable.
I always used CUE splitting software to separate tracks.
I need lidarr to support them
Lidarr can’t even get a reliable metadata provider or allow people to define their own without forking the project. It’s pretty mismanaged.
No Spotify?
Spotify is trash
I see someone didn’t read the article.












