• andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The creative justifications for creationism that try to approach something like science amuse me. Like Kents Hovind and Ham are both too stupid and incurious to be fun; a creationist who’s at least knowledgeable enough to look at “variable c” “”theories”” is entertaining to engage with. That’s part of how I’d justify calling this a “meme” anyway - it’s one of the brighter ones manufacturing a meme to sell to the stupid ones.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am torn about this situation.

          On the one hand, if this community is supposed to be about science (the procedure by which we achieve greater understanding of our world), not philosophy or religion, then does this meme fit here?

          While on the other, this community is “A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking”, so carry on!🤪

        • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The thing you have to realize about Ken Ham is: he has an Australian accent.

          As a pre-teen in the south, that’s practically the Crocodile Hunter.